Register now to get rid of these ads!

1950 chevy master cylinder question

Discussion in 'The Hokey Ass Message Board' started by GREASER815, Aug 7, 2011.

  1. GREASER815
    Joined: Dec 2, 2008
    Posts: 973

    GREASER815
    Member

    I just finished up going through the brakes on my 50 Styline. Everything is new and I am down to replacing the master cylinder. I installed a 53 powerglide rear axle and 53 front brakes. I am going to go with a brnd new stock replacement master, do I buy one for 1950 or 1953? Or does it matter either way. Just curious what others are doing. My car is a manual trans, I know that matters also because of the housing. Anyone know please post it up. Thanks
     
  2. lorax54
    Joined: Oct 29, 2009
    Posts: 233

    lorax54
    Member
    from Denton, TX

    So, if you have already gone through the trouble of doing the entire brake system, it would be a great time to add a dual mastercylinder. Way less expensive than a stock replacement, with just a tiny bit of fab work to get it together. Then you'll have benefit of dual circuits, and cheaper replacement parts for down the road.

    I think my master was $26. And if I remember right, a late60s-early70s chevy pickup.
     
  3. GREASER815
    Joined: Dec 2, 2008
    Posts: 973

    GREASER815
    Member

    I hate the adapter tubes, I am not scared of a single. Been around for ears and they still work. I will not go to a dual at his time, just wanting a bolt in and go stock unit. Wile the dual masters are cheap, the kits to install them are not and this car is way too nice to start hacking on it.
     
  4. fbama73
    Joined: Jul 12, 2008
    Posts: 989

    fbama73
    Member

    X2 What Lorax said. There's no way I'd ever replace my stock MC with another like it. I understand that the stock MC didn't do a bad job, the one in my car still works great. But, with a little fabrication, you can have separate circuits. That's a no-brainer to me. I'm building floors foir my car right now, and I'm accomodating a future change to a dual MC in the fab work.

    The fact that the dual MC is cheaper and easier to find is just gravy. To me, it's all about safety.
     

  5. BBYBMR
    Joined: Apr 27, 2007
    Posts: 612

    BBYBMR
    Member

    I would replace with the '50 unit.
     
  6. GREASER815
    Joined: Dec 2, 2008
    Posts: 973

    GREASER815
    Member

    Any easy ways to adapt a new dual to my stack master to retain my clutch pedal pivot etc.... I cannot afford a $400 kit but I am decent at building things, have access to a fab shop at work. Any pictures of stuff you guys have built or ideas?
     
  7. Paul
    Joined: Aug 29, 2002
    Posts: 16,413

    Paul
    Editor

    chevys of the 40s kit is less than $200, their on line catalog doesn't have a picture
    but if you could get a decent picture of one it shouldn't be too difficult to make.
    seems you gut and drill the end of the stock master and run a long rod through it to actuate a Mustang master behind it?
    I looked into it when I went through the brakes on my '51 last year,
    ended up going with a rebuilt stock master.
     
  8. GREASER815
    Joined: Dec 2, 2008
    Posts: 973

    GREASER815
    Member

    Napa part # 36239 is a dual master with internal residual valves. Will I need to run a proportioning valve and all that stuff or just a line of each port on the master to the front and one to back? I can make the bracket and just need to know whats all involved before starting.
     
  9. Just Gadget
    Joined: Aug 7, 2011
    Posts: 1,130

    Just Gadget
    Member

    I had a 49 sedan and lost the MC and just about ditched a new build, so I Would highly recommend a dual set up, the E brake as it was called back then, an emergency brake, problem was, mine did not work at that time. So the dual set up is a must for a safe driver. Just my 2 cents worth as a FNG here.
     
  10. GREASER815
    Joined: Dec 2, 2008
    Posts: 973

    GREASER815
    Member

    I am definetely being talked into a dual. Looking at the napa master I mentioned above. I can do the bracket just fine. Just want to know what is all involved plumbing wise. Wit an internal RPV do I just hook up my lines and go? Can it really be as simple as that?
     
  11. GREASER815
    Joined: Dec 2, 2008
    Posts: 973

    GREASER815
    Member

  12. Boones
    Joined: Mar 4, 2001
    Posts: 9,691

    Boones
    Member
    from Kent, Wa
    1. Northwest HAMBers

    I had to dump my 53 chevy into a ditch because of a single MC.. my 51 has a single but this winter I plan to switch it out. anytime the pedal feels sponge I fear something is going bad.. or if the brakes pedal moves slightly when stopped at a light on the brake and the pedal pushes alitte more.

    I hate having that doubt..
     
  13. Strange Agent
    Joined: Sep 29, 2008
    Posts: 2,879

    Strange Agent
    Member
    from Ponder, TX

    I'm in the process of doing this on my '57 Buick. If you're using drum-drum setup, I think you can just use the lines without using other valves. I'll let you know how it goes.
     
  14. FWIW, master cylinders are 100% interchangable from 1940 through 1954, and possibly earlier. Because the pedals mount on the master, they are specific to transmission type, but a Powerglide master will go right in a car that came with a manual and vice versa.

    Based on what I could see, the upgrade kit and a new master costs you less than to buy a good quality stock master (about $300 when I looked). You can buy NOS, and get what I did - a nice master with a ring of rust where the piston had sat all those years on the shelf. The upgrade is a bolt on, so there's no hacking needed. It seems like a no-brainer to me.
     
  15. ems customer service
    Joined: Nov 15, 2006
    Posts: 2,634

    ems customer service
    Member

    chassis engineering has a kit that requires no hacking on the car, the filling station has a master cylinder kit that is hack free.
     
  16. GREASER815
    Joined: Dec 2, 2008
    Posts: 973

    GREASER815
    Member

    So... if I buy the internal RPV master, it is all I need to buy? No other valves, etc.... Just fab it up, hook up my lines, bleed it, and ready to go? Correct me if I am wrong.
     
  17. Just Gadget
    Joined: Aug 7, 2011
    Posts: 1,130

    Just Gadget
    Member

    nothing else needed if front and rear drum. if front disc, you'll need an adjustable prop valve.
     
  18. GREASER815
    Joined: Dec 2, 2008
    Posts: 973

    GREASER815
    Member

    It appears the NAPA part number is no good. Does not pull up a master at all, just an idler pulley. Does anyone know of what application would use a master with internal residual valves, so I can order what I need?
     
  19. fbama73
    Joined: Jul 12, 2008
    Posts: 989

    fbama73
    Member

    I am definetely being talked into a dual. Looking at the napa master I mentioned above. I can do the bracket just fine. Just want to know what is all involved plumbing wise. Wit an internal RPV do I just hook up my lines and go? Can it really be as simple as that?

    Almost that simple, yes. You'll have to change the plumbing on the lines a bit. You'll want one line going to both rear, and the other going to both front. JustGadget is correct- you only nbeed a proportioning valve if you have a disc/drum setup. With drujms at all 4 corners, you don't need it.
    <!-- / message -->
     
  20. IWB
    Joined: Mar 17, 2007
    Posts: 95

    IWB
    Member

    Do a search for Texashardcore he did a tech article about updating 49-54 chevies to a dual circuit master cylinder it's worth looking at.
     
  21. I used a '67 camaro dual master on the firewall, hanging pedal from some kind of van. Have worked great for 16 years!

    Klaus
     

Share This Page

Register now to get rid of these ads!

Archive

Copyright © 1995-2021 The Jalopy Journal: Steal our stuff, we'll kick your teeth in. Terms of Service. Privacy Policy.

Atomic Industry
Forum software by XenForo™ ©2010-2014 XenForo Ltd.